The migration from monolithic systems to microservices architecture is a transformative journey for organizations aiming to achieve scalability, agility, and resilience in their software systems. While microservices enable faster development, independent scaling, and better fault isolation, the migration process is time and resource-consuming, and heavily reliant on domain expertise. However, the emergence of Machine Learning (ML) is reshaping this landscape, offering tools and methodologies to automate various aspects of the migration. To explore this intersection of ML and microservices migration, we conducted a literature review, analyzing 81 peer-reviewed papers. These studies provide valuable insights into how ML techniques are being applied to tackle the complexities of migration, from planning the migration to monitoring the deployed microservices.

Challenges in Microservices Migration

The migration from monolithic systems to microservices can be divided into five key steps, each presenting  challenges that organizations must address to ensure a successful migration:

  1. Pre-migration: Planning the Migration
    The initial step involves careful planning and strategy selection. Organizations must evaluate their existing systems to determine the feasibility of migration, identify the most suitable strategies, and align them with business goals. Challenges at this stage include accurately assessing system complexity, anticipating potential risks, and selecting tools and methodologies that suit the organization's needs.
  2. Identification: Detecting Functional Modules and Clustering Components
    This step involves analyzing the monolithic codebase to detect functional modules and dependencies. These components are then grouped into logical clusters that will form the microservices. The primary challenge here is handling the complexity of interdependent components, especially in legacy systems with years of accumulated technical debt. Misidentifying or improperly clustering components can lead to inefficient microservices that are tightly coupled or poorly defined.
  3. Packaging: Generating Missing Components
    Once functional modules are identified, missing components such as APIs, connectors, or communication protocols must be generated to ensure the microservices can function independently and interact. The challenge is that this phase is time-consuming and relies on exported developers.
  4. Deployment: Configuring Infrastructure
    Deploying microservices involves configuring the necessary infrastructure, which often includes containerization using tools like Docker and orchestration using platforms like Kubernetes. Challenges include ensuring scalability, reliability, and fault tolerance while managing the complexities of deploying multiple interdependent services across distributed environments.
  5. Monitoring: Performance Tracking and Anomaly Detection
    Post-migration, organizations must monitor the performance of microservices to ensure they remain stable under varying workloads. Anomaly detection becomes critical to identifying and addressing issues such as resource bottlenecks, latency, or communication failures. The challenge lies in setting up effective monitoring systems that provide actionable insights without overwhelming teams with excessive data.

How Machine Learning Helps?

Machine Learning has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges of microservices migration. By automating and optimizing complex tasks, ML reduces the manual effort, time, and risk associated with migration. Here's how ML can significantly aid in each step of the migration process:

  1. Pre-migration Planning
    ML models can analyze historical data from previous migrations and organizational benchmarks to recommend the most suitable migration strategies. Predictive analytics helps organizations anticipate potential risks and resource requirements, enabling better decision-making and prioritization.
  2. Identification of Functional Modules and Clustering Components
    One of the most labor-intensive phases of migration is analyzing the monolithic codebase to identify and cluster functional modules. ML techniques like Natural Language Processing (NLP) and graph-based clustering can automatically detect dependencies, extract insights from code comments, and identify cohesive modules.
  3. Packaging Missing Components
    After identifying modules, ML can assist in generating APIs, connectors, and other missing components required to make microservices operational. Large Language Models (LLMs) can auto-generate APIa or even code stubs for interaction between services. ML can also predict data migration patterns, ensuring compatibility and consistency between new and existing components.
  4. Deployment Optimization
    Deploying microservices involves complex configurations and resource allocation. Machine learning models analyze historical data to predict resource requirements for each service, ensuring efficient scaling and preventing over-provisioning. Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms can optimize deployment pipelines, identifying the best configurations for container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. Also, LLMs can help generate configuration files.
  5. Monitoring and Anomaly Detection
    Once the microservices are live, ML excels in monitoring performance and detecting anomalies. Advanced ML models continuously analyze system logs, performance metrics, and communication patterns to identify bottlenecks or deviations from expected behaviour. Also, ML algorithms can dynamically adjust resource allocation or load balancing based on real-time usage trends, ensuring consistent performance.

Limitations

Despite its benefits, incorporating ML into microservices migration comes with its own set of challenges. One major limitation is the need for high-quality data to train ML models. Without accurate and comprehensive datasets, the outputs of ML models can be unreliable, leading to suboptimal service boundaries or deployment strategies.

Additionally, ML models are not immune to errors. Misclassifications or overfitting can result in incorrect service decompositions, requiring manual intervention to correct. This highlights the importance of combining ML-driven approaches with expert validation.

Conclusion

The integration of Machine Learning into microservices migration offers a promising avenue for overcoming traditional challenges. By automating code analysis, optimizing service decomposition, and enhancing deployment strategies, ML can automate the complex, resource-intensive migration process. However, it is not a silver bullet; the success of ML in migration depends on quality data, careful implementation, and expert oversight. As organizations continue to adopt microservices, the role of ML will undoubtedly expand, paving the way for more efficient, accurate, and scalable migration strategies.